About the Podcast
UCLA Housing Voice is a podcast hosted by UCLA Lewis Center’s Shane Phillips, housing initiative manager, and co-hosted alternately by professors Mike Lens, Mike Manville, and Paavo Monkkonen. Research on housing affordability, displacement, development and policy is a fast-moving field, with important implications for policy and people. But research findings don’t often get shared with those beyond academia. In every episode, our hosts talk to a different housing researcher to help make sense of their work and how it can be applied in the real world.
Meet the Hosts
Episode Summaries and Show Notes
Episode 74: Racial (and Spatial) Disparities in Rental Assistance with Andrew Fenelon
Black households make up a disproportionate share of rent assistance recipients. Andrew Fenelon discusses how a “two-tiered approach to housing support," which has long favored white homeowners, helped create the disparity.
Episode 73: French For-Profit Social Housing Developers with Julie Pollard
Before the 2000s, French real estate developers were prohibited from building social housing. Today, they build more than half of it. Julie Pollard shares how two seemingly unrelated policies came together to make this rapid shift possible.
Episode 72: Notes on Tokyo’s Housing, Land Use, and Urban Planning with Shane Phillips
In this episode, Shane combines insights from a recent trip to Tokyo with official data on housing production, affordability, land use policy, and more.
Episode 71: How China Created a Housing Market with Lan Deng
Each year, more money is invested in China's housing market than any other. Lan Deng shares how the market was shaped and the heavy role the government still plays, and what housing in China looks like today.
Encore Episode: Japanese Housing Policy with Jiro Yoshida
We take a trip to Tokyo with Professor Jiro Yoshida of Pennsylvania State University and the University of Tokyo to learn from the successes and shortcomings of Japanese housing policy.
Episode 70: Overcoming Resistance to Density with David Kaufmann and Michael Wicki
What makes people more or less supportive of dense housing in their communities? David Kaufmann and Michael Wicki surveyed 12,000 residents in six of the largest U.S. and European cities to find out.
Episode 69: Low-Income Housing and ‘Crowd Out’ with Michael Eriksen
Subsidized affordable housing development reduces costs for lower-income households directly. It also reduces costs indirectly, by increasing the overall supply of housing — or does it? Michael Eriksen joins to discuss the issue of “crowd out” in affordable housing production.
Episode 68: Summarizing the Research on Homelessness with Janey Rountree (Pathways Home pt. 8)
In this final episode of the Pathways Home series on homelessness policy and research, we discuss key lessons and takeaways with our UCLA colleague, Janey Rountree.
Episode 67: How We Cut Veteran Homelessness By Half with Monica Diaz and Shawn Liu (Pathways Home pt. 7)
Since 2009, homelessness among U.S. veterans has fallen by more than half. Among the overall population, it hasn’t budged. We hear the story behind the Department of Veterans Affairs' success.
Episode 66: Chronic Homelessness and Housing First with Tim Aubry (Pathways Home pt. 6)
The Housing First approach starts with providing homes to chronically unhoused people, but it doesn’t stop there — and that’s what makes it so effective. Tim Aubry shares findings from a major Housing First study and the keys to a successful program.
Episode 65: Reducing Homelessness with Unconditional Cash Transfers with Jiaying Zhao (Pathways Home pt. 5)
A study in Vancouver, BC gave homeless individuals $7,500 each. The results? Reduced shelter use, more spending on food and rent, and no increase in spending on “temptation goods” like drugs and alcohol.
Episode 64: Ending Family Homelessness with Beth Shinn (Pathways Home pt. 4)
Beth Shinn discusses the Family Options Study, which found that long-term housing subsidies, like housing vouchers, led to much better outcomes for families experiencing homelessness — and at similar cost — compared to rapid rehousing, transitional housing, and “usual care.”